Assignment 2 Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 1

2 - Assignment ExampleIntuitively this faeces happen, entirely the prove presented does non excuse that such would lead to the kind of seemingly dramatic downswing in the quality of the kindred in the midst of Lindsey and Malik, as described. The literature describes this fallacy as the Slippery slope fallacy which is a fallacy where the evidence to make a given conclusion is not sufficient. here there may be an enlargement of the consequences of Lindseys going to university over having a baby. After all, Lindsey can entertain a baby and go to university, and the choice does not preclude Lindsey having a baby after university. Moreover, given that the couples relationship seems long-term, it is unlikely that just one event whose consequences can be reversible can lead to the downturn of the relationship. The consequence is reversible because they can always have a baby during or after university, assumptive that Lindsey is young and still have many childbearing years ahead of her (Bassham et al.). 2. Premise (1) The Globe and mail service and the Toronto Star reporters made the claim that Mayor Ford uses crack cocaine, and that the mayors brother was a drug dealer in the 80s. (2) Mayor Ford says that the reporters argon just a stack of maggots Conclusion People should not listen to the sleazebags. Fallacy Personal Attack Here the mayor says that because the reporters have questionable professional and personal ethical motive, the conclusion is that their assertions that the mayor did drugs and that his brother pushed drugs cannot be true. He is equating the reporters morals with the non-truth of their claims (Bassham et al.) It may be that the reporters are of questionable morals and integrity as far as expression for news and making sure that their newspapers are able to feed off sensational reporting, but the character of the reporters do not preclude them from making truthful claims relating to the activities of the mayor and his brother, espe cially since the newspapers themselves are reputable and can be presumed to have done its fact checking prior to the publication of the claims. The personal attacks on the reporters are not relevant to whether the mayor and his brother used/are using and/or dealt drugs (Bassham et al.). 3. Premise (1) There are many weight impairment platforms available. (2) The Weight Watchers sales associate said theirs is the best weight loss program among alternatives Conclusion The Weight Watchers program is the best there is. Fallacy Hasty Generalization Here the conclusion is that since the sales associate says Weight Watchers is the best, then that claim must be true. This is relying on the consent of one person, the sales associate, and not considering that other points of view may yield different answers as to which program is the best (Bassham et al.) It may be true that the Weight Watchers program that Keesha enrolled in is the best in the market, but this cannot be concluded from the evidence that Keesha presented, which is the word of the Weight Watchers sales associate. The evidence is small, and just consists of one precedent so to speak, whereas a more